Effect of saroglitazar 2 mg and 4 mg on glycemic control, lipid profile and cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 56-week, randomized, double blind, phase 3 study (PRESS XII study).

BACKGROUND: The potential for PPAR agonists to positively affect risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is of persistent attention. The PRESS XII study primarily aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar (2 mg and 4 mg) as compared to pioglitazone 30 mg on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In this randomized double-blind study, patients with T2DM [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5%] were enrolled from 39 sites in India. Patients received once-daily doses of either saroglitazar or pioglitazone (1:1:1 allocation ratio) for a total of 24 weeks. Patients were continued in a double blind extension period for an additional 32 weeks. Efficacy evaluations of glycemic parameters [HbA1c (Primary endpoint at week 24), FPG and PPG] and other lipid parameters (TG, LDL-C, VLDL-C, HDL-C, TC, Non HDL-C, Apo A1 and Apo B) were conducted at week 12, 24 and 56 and compared to the baseline levels. The efficacy analyses were performed by using paired t-test and ANCOVA model. RESULTS: A total of 1155 patients were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics were similar between the three treatment groups. The within group mean (± SD) change in HbA1c (%) from baseline of the saroglitazar (2 mg and 4 mg) and pioglitazone treatment groups at week 24 were: - 1.38 ± 1.99 for saroglitazar 2 mg; - 1.47 ± 1.92 for saroglitazar 4 mg and - 1.41 ± 1.86 for pioglitazone, respectively. Statistically significant reduction from baseline in HbA1c was observed in each treatment group at week 24 with p-value < 0.016. There was a significant reduction in TG, LDL-C, VLDL-C, TC and Non HDL-C with a significant increase in HDL-C from baseline levels (< 0.016). Most of the AE's were 'mild' to 'moderate' in severity and were resolved by the completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Saroglitazar effectively improved glycemic control and lipid parameters over 56 weeks in patients of T2DM receiving background metformin therapy and has a promising potential to reduce the cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients. Trial registration CTRI/2015/09/006203, dated 22/09/2015.

Abrogation of postprandial triglyceridemia with dual PPAR α/γ agonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

AIMS: Lowering postprandial lipemia may mitigate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. This study was aimed to investigate whether saroglitazar suppresses postprandial lipemia in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. METHODS: This was a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of saroglitazar in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. Thirty patients were randomized (1:1) to receive saroglitazar 4 mg or placebo orally once daily with metformin for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in plasma triglyceride (TG) area under the curve (AUC) on a standardized 8-h fat tolerance test. RESULTS: Thirty participants were randomized for interventions and eventually data of 19 participants qualified for per protocol analyses. Mean (SD) age in saroglitazar was 53.1 (8.8) years and 54.9 (7.7) years in placebo group. After 12 weeks, saroglitazar significantly lowered postprandial TG-AUC by - 458.3 (144.0) (- 25.7%, 95% CI - 765.1 to - 151.4) versus an increase of + 10.9 (157.9) (+ 0.5%, 95% CI - 325.6 to 347.3) mg/dL h in placebo group (P < 0.05). Saroglitazar lowered postprandial TG incremental AUC versus placebo: - 329.4 (89.9) (- 59%) versus + 80.4 (99.4) (+ 10%) mg/dL h (P < 0.05). HbA1c (%) decreased by - 0.36 (0.42) in the saroglitazar group as compared to an increase of + 1.26 (0.46) (P < 0.05) with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The saroglitazar treatment significantly improved postprandial TGs in people with diabetic dyslipidemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry of India; trial Registration No.: CTRI/2015/06/005845 and Date of registration: June 02, 2015.

New dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor agonist-Saroglitazar in diabetic dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: integrated analysis of the real world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Saroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) agonist, in clinical trials, has shown an improvement in lipid and glycemic parameters through the PPAR-α and γ agonist actions, respectively. It was granted marketing authorization in India in 2013 for diabetic dyslipidemia. This review was conducted to summarize the effects of Saroglitazar in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia in real world clinical studies conducted after marketing authorization in India. METHODS: In this review, we selected real world clinical studies of Saroglitazar published as manuscripts and abstracts presented at scientific conferences. In all these studies, patients with diabetic dyslipidemia were treated with Saroglitazar 4 mg once daily for at least 12 weeks and different lipid and glycemic parameters were measured at the baseline and end of the study. RESULTS: In 18 selected studies (5 published manuscripts and 13 abstracts), a total of 5824 patients with diabetic dyslipidemia were prescribed Saroglitazar 4 mg for a duration ranging from 12 to 58 weeks. Across all the studies, mean age of patients ranged from 49.6 to 59.1 years and the proportion of female patients ranged from 22% to 42%. Across all the studies, there was a consistent mean reduction in triglyceride levels (~ 45% to 62%), total cholesterol levels (~ 17% to 26%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (~ 21% to 36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (~ 11% to 27%), and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (~ 0.7% to 1.6%) with an increase in mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (up to 9%) from baseline to end of the study. Saroglitazar also improved alanine aminotransferase levels and fatty liver (evaluated by FibroScan™) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. Body weight remained unchanged and no significant adverse events (AEs) were reported in the studies. CONCLUSION: Saroglitazar effectively improved lipid and glycemic parameters without significant AEs in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia in real-world clinical studies of up to 58 weeks duration.

Phase I Clinical Study of ZYAN1, A Novel Prolyl-Hydroxylase (PHD) Inhibitor to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Administration in Healthy Volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This phase I study of ZYAN1 was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics following oral administration in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I study carried out in two parts in addition to a third part involving an open-label study to evaluate the food/sex effect. A total of 100 subjects were enrolled into the study as follows: part I-single-dose study with ZYAN1 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg (n = 56); part II-multiple-dose study with every other day dosing of ZYAN1 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg (n = 32); and part III-sex and food effect study with ZYAN1 150 mg (n = 12; open-label). RESULTS: ZYAN1 was well-tolerated after single and multiple oral ascending doses. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Following a single ascending dose of ZYAN1, the maximum concentration (C max) ranged from 566.47 ± 163.03 to 17,858.33 ± 2899.19 ng/mL and the median time to C max (t max) was approximately 2.5 h for the studied 30-fold oral doses of ZYAN1. Regardless of single or multiple doses, mean C max and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUC t ) values generally showed a dose-proportional increase. The mean elimination half-life (t ½) of ZYAN1 ranged from 6.9 to 13 h with negligible accumulation. Following a single dose of ZYAN1, the mean serum erythropoietin (EPO) C max values showed dose response (i.e., 6.6 and 79.9 mIU/L for 10 and 300 mg ZYAN1 doses, respectively), while the time to mean maximal serum EPO concentrations ranged from 10 to 72 h. CONCLUSION: Oral single (10-300 mg) and multiple dosing (100-300 mg) of ZYAN1 in healthy subjects was found to be safe and well-tolerated. With increasing ZYAN1 dose, there was almost a proportional increase in mean C max and AUC t . The mean serum EPO concentrations showed a trend of dose response. Based on the t ½, pharmacodynamic activity, and lack of drug accumulation, a once every 2 days dosing regimen of ZYAN1 was appropriate for phase II study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry trial ID ACTRN12614001240639.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Saroglitazar Magnesium, a Novel Dual PPARαγ Agonist, in Healthy Adult Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have recently become a focus of interest for their important roles in glucose and lipid metabolism. In humans, PPARα activation causes a decrease in plasma triglyceride (TG) levels, enhancement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and simultaneous enhancement of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) lipolysis, whereas PPARγ agonists act as insulin sensitizers and improve insulin resistance, which is very useful in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Saroglitazar magnesium is a dual PPAR agonist with potent predominant PPARα and moderate PPARγ activity and the first glitazar to be granted marketing authorization in India. This study was conducted to evaluate the oral bioavailability and safety and tolerability of a Lipaglyn™ (saroglitazar magnesium) 4-mg tablet in healthy, adult human subjects under fed relative to fasting conditions. METHODS: This was a single-dose, open-label, randomized, single-treatment, two-period, two-conditions (fed vs. fasting), two-sequence, crossover study planned in 54 healthy subjects. Food effect (high-calorie and high-fat breakfast) was examined by comparing pharmacokinetic data of saroglitazar and its metabolite saroglitazar sulfoxide in plasma samples collected pre-dose and serially up to 72 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using the standard non-compartmental approach. RESULTS: A total of 54 subjects were enrolled in the study, out of them 50 subjects had completed the study and were analyzed. The presence of food had a minor impact on the disposition of saroglitazar. While food reduced C max (maximum concentration) of saroglitazar by 30%, the extent of absorption as measured by AUC∞ (area under the concentration time curve from time zero to infinity) was not influenced. This was further supported by the bioequivalence data between fasted and fed conditions for saroglitazar, where 90% CIs (confidence intervals) of the adjusted geometric mean of the fed relative to the fasted condition ranged from 101.37% to 108.07% for AUC∞ and from 63.45% to 74.68% for C max. Other parameters such as T max (time of maximum concentration) and T 1/2 (elimination half-life) were not influenced by the food intake. Saroglitazar was well tolerated in the study, and the reported adverse events were mild in nature. CONCLUSION: For the single-dose study, the absorption rate is affected by food as the 90% CI of C max is outside 80.00-125.00%. However, there is no impact of food on the extent of absorption of saroglitazar. The observed lower C max of saroglitazar with food has no clinical relevance since the therapeutic efficacy of saroglitazar was achieved after multiple-dose administration, suggesting the importance of total exposure.